How helpdesk ratings differ above and below 500 employees
SMB here means a company with fewer than 500 employees — the cut these figures are scoped to. Each platform is shown twice, once from buyers under that line and once from buyers at or above it; neither is the figure published elsewhere on this channel, which lives on what customer-service platform buyers wish they'd known. Read the two columns against each other rather than down one: the interesting part of this table is which direction each platform moves.
| Platform | Under 500 | 500 and above |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 6.5 | |
| Support and in-app messaging in one tool. The highest figure in the table and the least firm — it rests on the fewest ratings any platform here can be reported on. | ||
| 7.9 | 7.5 | |
| A helpdesk built around ecommerce storefronts. Much the best-sampled platform with this group. | ||
| 7.5 | 6.5 | |
| A customer-service platform organised around people rather than tickets. Rated by few enough buyers in each group to carry no decimal. | ||
| 6.8 | 7.5 | |
| The category's most widely held platform. The only one of the four that reads higher with larger companies than with this group. | ||
| not rated | not rated | |
| Too few buyers in either group rate it for a scoped average to be meaningful. | ||
| not rated | not rated | |
| Too few buyers in either group rate it for a scoped average to be meaningful. | ||
| not rated | — | |
| An enterprise suite. Too few buyers under 500 rate it for an SMB-specific average to be meaningful, and its overall figure is published elsewhere. | ||
Two things about that table are worth stating plainly. The top figure rests on the least evidence: Intercom's 8 comes from the smallest sample that can be reported at all, while Gorgias's 7.9 comes from roughly ten times as many ratings in this group, so the 8 and the 7.9 should not be read as equally precise estimates. And the directions differ — three of the four read lower among companies of 500 and above, while Zendesk reads higher. The gap between Gorgias and Zendesk appears in the under-500 group but not in the 500-and-above group, where both average 7.5.
How much of a published rating is buyers your size
Every platform above also carries a figure across all interviews. This is what sits behind those figures — the share of each platform's ratings that comes from companies under 500 employees.
Share of each platform's buyer ratings that comes from companies under 500 employees. The bars run 0 to 100% and are not on the rating scale used in the table above.
The company-size mix varies sharply by platform. When an SMB reads Gorgias's published figure, most of what produced it is companies of roughly that size. When the same reader looks at Salesforce Service Cloud's, about a fifteenth of the ratings behind it come from companies under 500. Neither figure is wrong; they reflect very different company-size mixes. Gorgias's published figure is substantially more weighted toward companies under 500 than Salesforce Service Cloud's.
The counter-current: the best-sampled figure is not the highest one
Three cautions come with this table. The samples are very unequal — one platform carries most of the SMB ratings in the set and two carry the bare minimum, so the figures rest on very different amounts of evidence, and the top of the table rests on the least. A single product name can also cover different plan tiers, configurations and implementations at different company sizes, which this analysis does not separate; the corpus records the platform a buyer named, not the tier they bought. And a satisfaction average is not a fit assessment: none of these figures tells you what a platform costs to run at your ticket volume, or whether it handles the channels your customers actually use.
What this means if you are an SMB
A rating scoped to companies your size is closer to a peer benchmark than a corpus average, and it is still an average. Our read, not a practice buyers describe, is that the share behind a figure matters alongside the figure: a platform whose published rating draws mostly from larger companies gives an SMB a less size-matched benchmark. On this page that share runs from 85% down to about a fifteenth.
Want this read against your own stack?
Get my read →The narrow version is that the under-500 column gives an SMB a more size-matched benchmark than the blended figure. The pattern also changes in the 500-and-above group: Gorgias and Zendesk both average 7.5 there. What is worth taking away is how differently the published figures are composed: 85% of Gorgias's ratings come from companies under 500, against 46% of Zendesk's and 7% of Salesforce Service Cloud's. The questions that actually separate two finalists are the ordinary ones a rating cannot answer: what your ticket volume does to the bill, which channels the platform handles natively, and how much configuration it needs before it is useful.
For what buyers report after choosing, see what customer-service platform buyers wish they'd known; for why they move, why brands switch helpdesk platforms. The same split across other categories is in does company size change how buyers rate software.
Common questions
What is the best helpdesk for a small business?
Among the platforms rated by buyers at companies under 500 employees, Intercom carries the highest observed average at 8, but on the smallest sample that can be reported at all — Gorgias reads 7.9 on roughly ten times as many ratings from this group, which makes it the best-sampled figure in the table. Zendesk reads 6.8. None of this establishes a best fit for any particular company: these scores measure buyer satisfaction rather than fit, and they say nothing about what a platform costs to run at your ticket volume.
Is Gorgias or Zendesk better for a small business?
Buyers at companies under 500 employees rate Gorgias 7.9 and Zendesk 6.8, more than a point apart, and Gorgias has the larger sample in that group. The gap appears in the under-500 group but not in the 500-and-above group, where both average 7.5. What the data shows is different reported satisfaction between the two company-size groups, not a verdict on either product.
Why does the same helpdesk get a different rating from small and large companies?
The interviews do not settle why the ratings differ. One possible contributor is that the same product name can cover different plan tiers, configurations and implementations at different company sizes, which this analysis does not separate. Separately, the company-size mix behind each platform's published overall rating also varies substantially: 85% of Gorgias's ratings come from companies under 500, against 7% for Salesforce Service Cloud.
Should an SMB trust a published software rating?
It is a starting point rather than a peer benchmark, and the company-size mix behind it is useful context for interpreting the figure. On this page one platform's rating among companies under 500 employees sits three tenths of a point away from its broader figure, and for another only about a fifteenth of the ratings behind that figure come from companies under 500 at all. Our read, not a practice buyers describe, is that a scoped figure is closer to a company-size-matched benchmark than a corpus average, though it remains an average and the number of ratings behind it still matters.
Get this research made for your stack
These figures are the rating among companies under 500 employees, which is closer to a peer benchmark than a corpus average — but it is still an average. Do a 15-minute interview and get the read for your own ticket volume, channels and stack.
Get my personalized read — 15-min interviewNo password · your interview is anonymized before it ever informs a page like this one.