The brands behind these interviews are mostly consumer-goods makers and marketplace sellers whose retail media runs on Amazon and Walmart, and they describe a small group of completed moves, an observation from interviews rather than a switching rate. Four kinds of change are easy to confuse, so this page keeps them apart: swapping one tool for another, changing who runs the work, adding a tool on top of one already paid for, and dropping a tool with nothing in its place. The first two happen about equally often here. The tools also do different jobs: running campaigns (Pacvue, Skai, Quartile), tracking the digital shelf (Profitero, Stackline) and researching a marketplace (Helium 10, Jungle Scout). Some vendors now sell more than one, CommerceIQ retail media management beside digital-shelf analytics and Profitero media services beside its shelf data, but replacing an ad platform is a different decision from replacing a shelf tracker. Some completed tool swaps come with a complaint about the tool left; about as many follow an agency, a person, a global consolidation or work moving in-house. Which complaints put a contract in play is on top complaints about retail media platforms, and the companion read is what retail media buyers wish they'd known, where the ratings live.
Do brands switch the tool, or who runs it?
Both, about equally often, and the two are often tangled. Completed swaps of one tool for another are few here, and roughly as many brands changed who does the work instead. More of those changes went in-house than to a new agency. Ownership is not always one or the other: a brand can choose and pay for the platform while an agency runs the campaigns, as the global consumer-products maker below does, or buy a platform that comes with a service team, so a new software contract does not always mean a change in who does the work. A global food company says of its retail search, “We utilized external partners previously and decided to manage that more hands-on,” and the move came with a new Skai partnership. An industrial-products manufacturer that first used Pacvue for sales operations extended it when the work moved: “as we brought Amazon advertising in-house, they also have an advertising side to their platform and the two of them play very nicely together.” Pacvue's own site now describes one system for retail media, commerce management and measurement.
The agency moves run the other way, toward fewer agencies rather than none. A hardware brand replaced separate partners because “Previously, there was one for Amazon, one for Walmart, one for Google and Meta, and all of them were not working in unison,” and now uses one. A household-products manufacturer ran an agency RFP and ended with one agency for Amazon and another for the rest of its US retailers. Several more brands are weighing the question without having moved: a direct-to-consumer household brand says “we're debating whether we continue to work with an agency or bring things fully in-house,” and a baby-products brand planning to take Amazon in-house expects that it “will need to use a platform for our advertising campaigns.” Whether software can stand in for service is lesson five on the lessons page.
The pressure that builds: why brands switch retail media tools
Among completed replacements that come with a complaint, price against value and a tool that did not fit the job appear about equally. Price also comes up in planned changes and open evaluations, which makes it the complaint mentioned most often across completed and unresolved decisions here, with overlap behind several decisions still open. Those outcomes differ: looking at a cheaper option is not leaving, a complaint beside a completed move does not show it caused the move, and one decision can carry several pressures.
Price against what the tool delivers
Buyers raise it across different kinds of tool: a campaign platform, a digital-shelf tracker and a tool one brand found cost more than its Amazon ads. It sits beside completed departures and beside evaluations still open, and across both it comes up more often than any other complaint here. Not every price complaint led to a switch. The stories are on the complaints page, along with one departure that was reversed after the buyer and vendor reached a new arrangement. These are each buyer's reading of their own contract at their own spend and date; a past price is not a current one, and how the fees are structured is on what buyers actually pay for retail media.
Named in this context: Pacvue · Profitero · Stackline · Skai
A tool that did not fit the job
Some replacements come down to fit for a retailer or a task, and the fit is judged within one kind of tool: a research tool against other research tools, a shelf tracker against other shelf trackers, not against a campaign platform doing a different job. A consumer-electronics brand selling on Amazon and Walmart says of its research tool, “We've used other ones like Jungle Scout in the past, but Helium 10 is what we decided on,” judging Jungle Scout less robust for Walmart, its own reading at the time. A large packaged-food manufacturer moved to Profitero three years ago through an RFP “in which we had an incumbent who was not meeting our needs,” scoring candidates on uptime, data quality, support and ease of use before price. That is one company's set of criteria, not a standard scorecard.
Named in this context: Helium 10 · Jungle Scout · Profitero
Two tools that start to do the same job
Large manufacturers often add a tool rather than replace one, and the overlap becomes the next question. The lessons page covers CommerceIQ running beside Profitero. Smaller sellers see it too: a marketplace seller running Helium 10 for keyword research and Perpetua for bidding notices that “Perpetua is starting to add some of the features from Helium10 onto it,” and would rather have one tool doing more. No completed move here came from overlap alone.
Named in this context: CommerceIQ · Profitero · Helium 10 · Perpetua
The event that fires the decision
Several completed swaps name an event rather than a complaint. These counts are small, and an event can accompany a move without having caused it.
The agency, or the person at the agency
A cleaning-products brand whose agency runs its marketplaces moved from Xnurta to Pacvue, and gave one reason: “We moved off because the team manager at our accounts was used to using Pacvue.” It had rated Xnurta well and named no weakness. Agencies shape choices at the large end too. A large beer company is “looking to kind of condense the tech stack based on this agency of record,” which includes adopting more of Profitero, whose parent company is part of the same group, and a personal-care manufacturer took up Amazon Marketing Cloud partly because “It was also highly recommended by our agency that we work with.” Whether marketing tools follow people more broadly is on do marketing tools follow people?
Named in this context: Pacvue · Xnurta · Profitero · Amazon Marketing Cloud
A global push to one technology partner
Global companies run retail media differently by region, and a push to standardize puts every regional tool in play at once. One global consumer-products maker consolidated on a single platform, in the first story below. A global beauty group's central team is evaluating Pacvue against its incumbent Skai, and the local lead expects the job will be to “see if it adds more value than Skai or is it the same.” A global beverage company is meeting Skai and CommerceIQ for a global RFP. Neither evaluation has concluded.
Named in this context: Pacvue · Skai · CommerceIQ
The know-how arrives in-house
Brands that learn the work from an agency sometimes take it back. A multi-brand consumer-products company that had an agency running programmatic through Pacvue says “we have now in-housed it, and we're going to do it ourselves.” A home-health products company that had used agencies with their own tools says “we found that managing advertising in-house is best for us.” A media company plans to phase out its Amazon display agency because “we learned enough from them; we kind of built the know-how internally.” The reverse also appears: a seasonal consumer-goods brand that runs Skai itself would prefer a third party to take campaigns off its hands. More on that decision is on build or buy.
Named in this context: Pacvue · Skai
An AI layer over data the brand already buys
The newest event is a search for analysis on top of digital-shelf data rather than a better scrape. A large packaged-food manufacturer says “Profitero's main strength is the base technology, which has become a commodity now,” and it has been testing CommerceIQ, alongside other vendors, as a layer that connects shelf, sales and search data. The money for it would come from existing contracts: “A lot of it's going to be shifting away from some of our current contracts.” It is a test, not a completed move, and that buyer's reading of the market is its own.
Named in this context: Profitero · CommerceIQ
Where do brands switch to?
Pacvue is the destination named most often here, counting completed changes and new selections together, though not every one replaced a competing tool. A consumer-health company moved its e-commerce work to it from a managed service. The cleaning-products brand above left Xnurta because its agency's account manager was used to Pacvue. The global consumer-products maker below standardized on it after using it in another region. Two brands picking their first platform were heading to it, neither yet running it. That makes it the destination named most often in this sample, not the winner of a measured switching market. Skai gains and loses: a global food company and a seasonal consumer-goods brand moved onto it, while one company left it for another platform a few years ago and the global beauty group above is weighing an alternative. These are few moves, and they establish no trend toward or away from any vendor. Buyer-by-buyer, the two compare on Pacvue vs. Skai.
The line between software and service moves in both directions. The seasonal brand calls Quartile “a tool” and left it for Skai, saying “We exited that relationship and moved into that Skai partnership,” and now runs campaigns itself. The hardware brand above calls Quartile the “ad agency” that manages its paid media, after consolidating its partners into it. Quartile markets an optimization platform combined with a full-service offering, so the same vendor can mean a change of technology, a change in who runs the campaigns, or both. Among digital-shelf tools, the completed replacements here run more than one way, to Stackline on price and to Profitero through an RFP; the two compare on Stackline vs. Profitero.
Want this checked against your own stack?
Start my checkup →The stories behind the switches
The counter-current: why many stay
Most brands running these tools in the interviews describe no completed move. A consumer-health company says “We try to give these things a good two or three years of use before we start to look at other options and opportunities.” A food manufacturer whose digital-shelf rollout was rough has stayed so far, and asked what changed, says “I think it was just like we were patient, to be honest.” A global packaged-food manufacturer keeps every partner on a short leash rather than leaving: “We review our partners in the digital commerce space every year,” and “we don't commit to long-term contracts in this space.” The cost of switching that keeps others in place is on what buyers actually pay. These are reasons to stay, not a measure of loyalty to any vendor.
What this means if you're weighing a switch
In these interviews the question before a retail media tool change is often who will run the work, and several completed tool swaps followed an agency, a person or a global consolidation rather than a complaint about the tool. Where a complaint did come with the move, price against value led. Pacvue is named most often across completed changes and new selections, and Skai appears on both sides of completed moves; neither shows a vendor gaining share, a vendor-wide trend or a general preference. What the evidence does not show is that any vendor is in decline, that a higher-rated tool is safer from departure, or that a brand that moved in-house or changed agencies performs better afterward. These are small counts of completed moves, and results are the buyers' own reading of their own programs.
Our recommendations, not practices buyers describe. Before comparing tools, decide who holds the platform contract, who runs campaigns day to day and who checks the results independently. If an agency is involved, establish whether it works on the brand's licence or its own, and what happens to campaign history, data access and reporting if the relationship ends; ask which platform it prefers and why, and whether that fits how the brand means to run retail media in the long term. If the agency or account lead changes, check whether the tool is about to change with them. Before adding a tool, list what the ones you already pay for cover. Compare equivalent scope across options, including retailer coverage, seats, managed services, agency fees and the time a migration takes from campaign optimization. Test any new platform on your top retailers during the trial. For the ratings, see what retail media buyers wish they'd known; for what retail media is, what is retail media?
Common questions
Why do brands switch retail media tools?
In these interviews, some completed tool swaps come with a complaint about the tool left, most often price against value or a tool that did not fit the job. About as many follow an event instead: a new agency or account manager, a global push to one technology partner, or work moving in-house. Some name no reason at all. A complaint that accompanies a move did not necessarily cause it, and the counts here are small.
Do brands replace their retail media agency with software, or the other way round?
Both happen, and changing who runs the work is about as common here as changing the tool. Among completed changes, more brands brought the work in-house, usually keeping or adding a platform to run it, than moved to a new agency; the agency moves consolidated several channel agencies into one or split Amazon from the other retailers. Several more brands are weighing the same question. Software and service blur: one vendor is called a tool by one buyer and an agency by another.
Where do brands go when they leave a retail media platform?
Pacvue is the destination named most often in these interviews, in completed moves and new selections alike, and Skai both gains and loses companies. Some brands move to a self-service platform from a managed one and others the reverse, and some drop a tool with nothing dedicated in its place. These are few moves, so they show where some brands went, not a trend or a market share.
Are brands leaving Skai for Pacvue?
Not as an established trend. One global beauty group is evaluating Pacvue against its incumbent Skai, and one company left Skai for another platform a few years ago. But Skai also gained companies here, including a global food company that took its retail search in-house on Skai and a brand that left Quartile for it. Pacvue rates around 8/10 and Skai around 7/10 on the retail media lessons page.
Do brands switch digital-shelf tools like Profitero, Stackline and CommerceIQ?
Rarely, in these interviews; adding one is at least as common. A few large manufacturers run CommerceIQ beside Profitero, and one is testing CommerceIQ and others as an AI layer over the data it already buys. Completed replacements are few and run in more than one direction: one company moved to Stackline on price, another chose Profitero through an RFP. One manufacturer reviews every partner in this space each year rather than signing long contracts.
Get a checkup on your tech stack
A checkup for your marketing stack, built from hundreds of verified buyer interviews: what matters most to you, a shortlist for your stack, and your next steps.
Start my checkupFree · no password · your answers are anonymized before they inform research like this.